10-02-2013, 03:52 PM
1
No matter how I install the latest OptiFlasher, I get this error message every time I open the app.
SSL-BT not exist! do you want to download?
I've searched hi-n-lo and the only thing I found was Yassinov's suggestion to another member here, to d/l and unpack the contents of SSL-BT.rar to a SSL-BT subdirectory where the main application's .exe is located. Still the error message!
I've tried unpacking all the sslxx.nfi files both in the subdir above and also in the root dir of Optiflasher's .exe and nothing. I even tried placing the Optiflasher.exe in the SSL-BT subdirectory and still nada.
Also, when I choose "YES" to the app's question: "do you want to download?", it appears to d/l but I see nothing but an empty SSL-BT subdirectory in Optiflasher's directory. (hence why I had to manually d/l the .rar and unpack it manually as well)
Thanks in advance!
Brazen
SSL-BT not exist! do you want to download?
I've searched hi-n-lo and the only thing I found was Yassinov's suggestion to another member here, to d/l and unpack the contents of SSL-BT.rar to a SSL-BT subdirectory where the main application's .exe is located. Still the error message!
I've tried unpacking all the sslxx.nfi files both in the subdir above and also in the root dir of Optiflasher's .exe and nothing. I even tried placing the Optiflasher.exe in the SSL-BT subdirectory and still nada.
Also, when I choose "YES" to the app's question: "do you want to download?", it appears to d/l but I see nothing but an empty SSL-BT subdirectory in Optiflasher's directory. (hence why I had to manually d/l the .rar and unpack it manually as well)
Thanks in advance!
Brazen
Quote:Also.... I constantly get the error SSL-BT not exist! do you want to download? every time I start the program. I answer yes and it appears to download, only to error out like this again. I have manually downloaded, extracted, and placed the SSL-BT.rar in the DIR I have the Optiflasher .exe in. I also created a SSL-BT subDIR and manually unrar'ed the SSLxx.nfi files there as well for thoroughness... still the error?